Evaluating Case Formulation Decision-Making and Therapist Responsivity: Competencies and Methods of Evaluation
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper two research studies by Eells (2010) and Edwards (2010) evaluating case formulation and therapist responsiveness are summarized and critically evaluated. The central themes abstracted from these studies are subsequently articulated and integrated with existing research on the philosophical and theoretical competencies, clinical competencies, and quantitative competencies needed for effective case formulation. More specifically, I introduce and evaluate the work of Edwards and Eells in terms of a behavioral model of case formulation that is based on four general principles: functionalism; empiricism, cognitive-behavioral learning theory; and a multivariate perspective that stresses the importance of collecting multimodal and multimethod assessment data as the basis of a case formulation.
منابع مشابه
Senior Medical Students' Self Evaluation of their Capability in General Competencies in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Introduction: Evaluating graduates' proficiencies can provide a helpful reflection of medical education performance and lead to its improvement. The aim of this study was to assess general competencies of final year medical students from their own viewpoints. Methods: In this descriptive–evaluative study, 71 graduating students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences evaluated themselves base...
متن کاملA Fuzzy Approach for Projects Evaluation and Selection an Iranian Auto Manufacturer Case Study
Evaluating and selecting alternatives investment projects needs considering all relevant and important aspects. In traditional methods, the focus is just on tangible monetary criteria. Also in the traditional methods, either all the information’s about factors must be known precisely or sufficient objective data must be available for applying probability theory. In this paper, a combinative app...
متن کاملA multi-criteria decision making approach for priority areas selection in membrane industry for investment promotion: a case study in Iran Marketplace
Membrane technologies for the separation of mixtures have gained an extensive worldwide attraction in the modern industrialized world. They have many industrial and medical applications such as water desalination, wastewater reclamation, gas separation, food and medical applications. However, even though all these applications have their own efficiency and market, the selection of priority appl...
متن کاملIndifferent Points in The Multicriteria Decision Making Problems (A Case Study of Suppliers’ Evaluation in Zanjan Province Gas Company)
Evaluating and selecting the right contractors can increase the chances of success of a project and the organization. Considering the intense competition faced by organizations today, proper cost management to enhance profitability and customer satisfaction has attracted a lot of attention. The evaluation of contractors is usually a process thatis based on various criteria.By the end of it, the...
متن کاملThe place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management
As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously. Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses ...
متن کامل